Eng
s
☰
홈
자료실
Engs 모의고사
자료요청
유머/감동/공포
나의 학습
문제풀기
› 모의고사 (자동 편성)
영어 모의고사 (자동 편성)
전체
고1
고2
고3
문제를 준비하고 있어요
●
문제 은행에서 문항 고르기
○
난이도순으로 편성
○
마무리 검토
0%
총 10문항 · 고3 ·
새로 편성
문제 1
Philosopher Jeremy Bentham designed the panopticon, a prison structure in which a central watchtower allows a single guard ①
observing
every cell, while inmates can never determine whether they are actually ②
being
watched at any given moment. French theorist Michel Foucault later transformed this architectural idea into a broader theory of power, arguing that the mere possibility of being observed is often sufficient ③
to produce
obedient behavior, since individuals internalize the watcher's gaze and begin to discipline themselves even in the watcher's absence. Foucault extended this logic beyond prisons to schools, hospitals, and workplaces, ④
suggesting
that modern institutions increasingly rely on continuous, often invisible observation rather than physical force to maintain order. Contemporary scholars have applied Foucault's framework to digital surveillance, arguing that smartphones and workplace monitoring software ⑤
recreate
panoptic conditions on a vastly larger scale.
다음 글의 밑줄 친 부분 중, 어법상 틀린 것은?
①
②
③
④
⑤
문제 2
A few years ago, spotting a manipulated video ①
required
a trained eye and specialized software. Today, freely available applications allow almost anyone ②
to
swap a face or fabricate a voice convincingly enough to fool casual viewers within minutes. This shift has quietly undermined one of the oldest assumptions in human communication: that seeing and hearing something ③
are
a reasonably reliable way to confirm it happened. Journalists now face the burden of ④
verifying
footage that once would have been accepted as self-evident proof. Perhaps more troubling than any single fake video is the broader effect on public trust, in which genuine footage can ⑤
be
dismissed as fabricated simply because deepfakes exist.
다음 글의 밑줄 친 부분 중, 어법상 틀린 것은?
①
②
③
④
⑤
문제 3
Sociologist Karl Mannheim argued that individuals ①
who
come of age during the same historical period tend to share a distinctive outlook shaped by the events, technologies, and crises that defined their formative years, a phenomenon he called a generational unit. Because each generation absorbs its foundational assumptions during adolescence and early adulthood, when identity ②
are
still forming, later generations raised amid different circumstances often ③
develop
noticeably different values regarding work, authority, and communication, even within the same family. This divergence produces what is commonly called a generational gap, most visible when older members of a household ④
interpret
a younger relative's habits as a rejection of tradition rather than a rational adaptation to a genuinely different social environment. Mannheim cautioned against viewing either generation as simply right or wrong, insisting instead that each generation's worldview ⑤
reflects
a coherent response to the particular historical conditions it encountered.
다음 글의 밑줄 친 부분 중, 어법상 틀린 것은?
①
②
③
④
⑤
문제 4
When consumers compare two products and assume that the one labeled "eco-friendly" is automatically the more ①
sustainable
choice, they often overlook the complexity involved in verifying such a claim. Life cycle assessment, commonly abbreviated as LCA, is a systematic method developed to evaluate the environmental impact of a product across every stage of its existence. By tracing a product from its origin to its disposal, this approach reveals impacts that might otherwise remain ②
hidden
from consumers who see only the finished item on a shelf. For example, an electric vehicle may produce no emissions while being driven, yet the mining of metals for its battery can generate ③
substantial
environmental costs elsewhere. Without accounting for these earlier stages, a ④
superficial
comparison could mistakenly present the vehicle as entirely emission-free. Therefore, researchers increasingly rely on life cycle assessment to make ⑤
uninformed
decisions rather than trusting labels alone.
다음 글의 밑줄 친 부분 중, 문맥상 낱말의 쓰임이 적절하지 않은 것은?
①
②
③
④
⑤
문제 5
Structural functionalism approaches society as a complex system of ①
interdependent
parts, each contributing to the overall stability and smooth operation of the whole, much as organs contribute to the survival of a biological body. Sociologist Talcott Parsons argued that institutions such as the family, education, religion, and government each perform necessary functions, socializing new members and transmitting values, so that removing or weakening any one institution ②
stabilizes
the equilibrium of the entire system. Robert Merton refined this framework by distinguishing manifest functions, the intended and openly recognized consequences of a social practice, from latent functions, ③
unintended
consequences that nonetheless help sustain the system, such as schools serving not only to educate but also to provide childcare that allows parents to work. Critics have long charged that functionalism, by emphasizing stability and equilibrium, struggles to explain social ④
conflict
and rapid change, since it tends to interpret persistent inequality as somehow functional for society rather than as a problem requiring ⑤
correction
.
다음 글의 밑줄 친 부분 중, 문맥상 낱말의 쓰임이 적절하지 않은 것은?
①
②
③
④
⑤
문제 6
When people are asked to judge how risky or beneficial a particular technology is, they ①
often
conduct anything resembling a careful cost-benefit analysis. Instead, they consult a quick emotional impression, an ②
instinctive
sense of whether the technology feels good or feels bad, and let that impression guide their entire judgment. This mental shortcut, known as the affect heuristic, produces a ③
curious
pattern that traditional risk theory struggles to explain: activities people like tend to be judged as both safer and more beneficial, while activities they dislike are judged as both riskier and less beneficial, even when no logical relationship between risk and benefit exists. For example, when researchers presented a fictional industrial chemical alongside a brief description emphasizing its convenience, participants rated it not only as more useful but also, ④
illogically
, as less dangerous. Because emotional impressions form so rapidly and feel so trustworthy, correcting for this heuristic requires ⑤
deliberate
effort; simply presenting more accurate statistics to already anxious or enthusiastic audiences rarely changes their underlying judgment.
다음 글의 밑줄 친 부분 중, 문맥상 낱말의 쓰임이 적절하지 않은 것은?
①
②
③
④
⑤
문제 7
Dual coding theory, first proposed to explain why certain kinds of information are remembered more readily than others, holds that the mind processes verbal and visual material through two partially
independent
① channels rather than a single unified system. According to this account, words and other linguistic symbols are encoded primarily through a verbal channel that represents meaning in a
concrete
②, sequential form, while pictures and concrete objects are encoded through an imagery channel that preserves spatial and perceptual detail. When information engages both channels simultaneously, as when a textbook pairs a written explanation with an accompanying diagram, the resulting memory trace benefits from two separate, mutually
reinforcing
③ pathways of retrieval rather than just one. This redundancy explains the well-documented picture
superiority
④ effect, whereby concrete, easily visualized words tend to be recalled more accurately than abstract terms that resist mental imagery. Consequently, dual coding theory has profound implications for instructional design, suggesting that combining carefully chosen visuals with concise verbal explanations can
strengthen
⑤ students' long-term retention of complex material.
다음 글의 밑줄 친 부분 중, 문맥상 낱말의 쓰임이 적절하지 않은 것은?
①
②
③
④
⑤
문제 8
Philosophers sometimes ask their students to imagine a creature physically identical to an ordinary human being in every measurable respect, one that walks, talks, laughs, and even cries out in apparent pain when injured, yet that has no inner conscious experience whatsoever. (A) Critics respond that mere conceivability proves very little about what is genuinely possible in the real world. (B) This imagined being, commonly called a philosophical zombie, behaves exactly as a conscious person would, since every neuron fires in precisely the same pattern. (C) Defenders of the argument claim that because such a zombie is at least conceivable without any logical contradiction, consciousness itself cannot be fully explained by physical processes alone.
주어진 글 다음에 이어질 글의 순서로 가장 적절한 것은?
①
(A)-(B)-(C)
②
(B)-(A)-(C)
③
(B)-(C)-(A)
④
(C)-(A)-(B)
⑤
(C)-(B)-(A)
문제 9
This malfunction, harmless as it sounds, reveals something troubling: memory and psychological continuity alone cannot fully settle what personal identity actually requires. Imagine a teleportation device that scans every atom in your body, transmits that information to a distant station, and reconstructs an exact physical duplicate there, while destroying the original body in the process. ( ① ) From the traveler's point of view, stepping into the machine and stepping out on the other side would feel utterly seamless, complete with continuous memories and a sense of having simply walked through a door. ( ② ) Philosophers, however, are troubled by a version of the same device that malfunctions. ( ③ ) Instead of destroying the original, it leaves the original body intact while still creating a perfect duplicate elsewhere. ( ④ ) Now two people exist, each with identical memories and an equally strong claim to being the original traveler, and there is no principled way to say which one is the real continuation of the person who entered the machine. ( ⑤ )
글의 흐름으로 보아, 주어진 문장이 들어가기에 가장 적절한 곳은?
①
②
③
④
⑤
문제 10
Critics note a further irony: when something goes wrong, such as a hacked exchange or a lost password, there is often no institution left to appeal to. Blockchain technology was originally promoted as a way to remove the need for trusted middlemen, allowing strangers to exchange value directly and verify transactions through a shared, tamper-resistant ledger. ( ① ) In theory, this design distributes power away from any single institution and toward the network as a whole. ( ② ) In practice, however, a small number of large players have come to dominate many blockchain networks. ( ③ ) They control enough computing power or currency to influence outcomes that were supposed to be decided collectively. ( ④ ) Whether decentralization can survive this concentration of power remains one of the technology's most unresolved questions. ( ⑤ )
글의 흐름으로 보아, 주어진 문장이 들어가기에 가장 적절한 곳은?
①
②
③
④
⑤
0/10 응답
채점하기